Your reasoning is flawed because you start from numbers given by science at the time of your article. As you may have seen with recent discoveries from James Webb Telescope, new possible origins of the beginning of our world are being brought to light.

Science is evolving, and it is somewhat not interesting to try to find explanations that may be far from our capabilities of understanding of what/who is beyond...

If you want to be a believer, be one and believe. But, please don't try to elaborate any scientific argumentation to a non scientific concept.

I am an agnostic only because there is more interesting things to find out in our real world than finding an explanation for any hypothetical world outside.